Re: [dev] [sbase] chvt.c does not need to be executable

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Galos, David <galosd83_AT_students.rowan.edu>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:08:27 -0400

> so why keep it executable...

Indeed. chvt.c is now 644.
Received on Tue Jul 02 2013 - 18:08:27 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: sin: "Re: [dev] [sbase] chvt.c does not need to be executable"
Previous message: Nick: "Re: [dev] Suckless Laser GUI"
In reply to: Jakob Kramer: "[dev] [sbase] chvt.c does not need to be executable"
Next in thread: sin: "Re: [dev] [sbase] chvt.c does not need to be executable"
Reply: sin: "Re: [dev] [sbase] chvt.c does not need to be executable"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Jul 02 2013 - 18:12:06 CEST