Re: [dev] slock: anti OOM killer - proper priv dropping - etc.

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: koneu <koneu93_AT_googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 08:47:20 +0200

On 26.07.2013, at 00:46, Joerg Jung <mail_AT_umaxx.net> wrote:
>
> hence shoul be in an ifdef linux or something.
>
Or use setpriority() to make it portable.

~koneu
Received on Fri Jul 26 2013 - 08:47:20 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Thorsten Glaser: "Re: [dev] Re: coreutils / moreutils - DC a directory counter"
Previous message: Calvin Morrison: "Re: [dev] Re: coreutils / moreutils - DC a directory counter"
In reply to: Joerg Jung: "Re: [dev] slock: anti OOM killer - proper priv dropping - etc."
Next in thread: Robert Schneider: "RE: [dev] slock: anti OOM killer - proper priv dropping - etc."
Reply: Robert Schneider: "RE: [dev] slock: anti OOM killer - proper priv dropping - etc."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Jul 26 2013 - 08:48:06 CEST