Re: [dev] Wayland st!!??

From: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero <>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 09:04:25 +0200

> I'm the author of the port. I'm not sure how the suckless community
> feels about Wayland, but it seems like the core protocol is fairly
> lightweight, depends only on libffi, and is refreshing to work with
> compared to X. Weston's goals are perhaps more orthogonal to suckless,
> but I think there is potential for a suckless compositor.

Your port seems very interesting, but it is a big modification to st,
which makes difficult any merge from master branch. I don't know
the opinion of other st developers, but I think could be a good option
factorize the code and allow different display codes.

Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
Received on Tue Aug 06 2013 - 09:04:25 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Aug 06 2013 - 09:12:06 CEST