Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] More compatible with xterm

From: Mihail Zenkov <>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:06:55 +0000

2013/9/30, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero <>:
>> I check this. To pass this test we also should report cursor position.
> Again, your patch is good, but I have tested vttest and it
> continues failing. I am going to apply your patches in a week
> (I usually wait a week before appling any patch, so anyone can
> look it and catch a bug), but I think we should try catch
> what it is wrong in this test of vttest.

Are you mean test this: 11. Test non-VT100 (e.g., VT220, XTERM)
terminals -> 8. Test XTERM special features -> 7. Alternate-Screen
features (xterm) ? With my patches st pass this test.

You applied two patch (one in my first mail and next in second mail)?
Received on Mon Sep 30 2013 - 21:06:55 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Sep 30 2013 - 21:12:06 CEST