Re: [dev] Suckless remote shell?

From: Alexander Huemer <alexander.huemer_AT_xx.vu>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:27:14 +0100

On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:11:40PM +0300, Alexander S. wrote:
> 2013/11/4 FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>:
> > On Sun, 3 Nov 2013 18:57:23 -0500
> > Jacob Todd <jaketodd422_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> No one ever said it had to be in c you fucking nerd.
> >
> > No one ever said it, because it is expected to be in C.
> > Go is a disgrace and I'm glad every time I see a Go-Project bit-rot to
> > death.
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > FRIGN, a fucking nerd.
>
> Don't want to start a flame, but C isn't exactly state of the art
> language. I shall agree that Go has problems, but why it would be a
> disgrace any worse than a living fossil C is?

The only interface to the kernels the suckless.org software runs on is
in C, the same is true for the standard librar{y,ies}. Software written
in any other language is an indirection.

Just my $0.02.

Kind regards,
-Alex
Received on Mon Nov 04 2013 - 15:27:14 CET