Re: [dev] Suckless remote shell?

From: koneu <koneu93_AT_googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 07:40:51 +0100

Louis Santillan wrote:
> All we ever needed was 17 syscalls <http://wiki.osdev.org/Porting_Newlib>.

I would rather implement a syscall for each C library function than use
newlib. - This would also make static binaries much smaller. :P
Received on Tue Nov 05 2013 - 07:40:51 CET