Re: [dev] Announcing sinit - the suckless init

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: sin <sin_AT_2f30.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:11:23 +0000

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:53:16PM +0100, Krol, Willem van de wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:02 PM, sin <sin_AT_2f30.org> wrote:
> > Yes, I realize signalfd() is Linux specific... aw well.
>
> Why did you choose signalfd() over sigwait()? The only advantage of
> signalfd() seems to be poll()-ing or similar actions, which are not
> used in sinit.

Fixed :)
Received on Mon Feb 10 2014 - 21:11:23 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Krol, Willem van de: "Re: [dev] Announcing sinit - the suckless init"
Previous message: sin: "Re: [dev] Announcing sinit - the suckless init"
In reply to: Krol, Willem van de: "Re: [dev] Announcing sinit - the suckless init"
Next in thread: Krol, Willem van de: "Re: [dev] Announcing sinit - the suckless init"
Reply: Krol, Willem van de: "Re: [dev] Announcing sinit - the suckless init"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Feb 10 2014 - 21:24:02 CET