Re: [dev] Re: Article about suckless on

From: Anselm R Garbe <>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:22:02 +0100

On 21 February 2014 07:21, Anselm R Garbe <> wrote:
> On 20 February 2014 18:27, koneu <> wrote:
>> Nick wrote:
>>> Yes, but the web-viewer could suck less, internally. GTK & glib
>>> being rather obvious examples. With that in mind I thought I'd take
>>> another look at webkitnix today, and found that they're not planning
>>> to maintain it anymore. Which sucks.
>> Sad... I had hoped for uzbl to switch to it so I'd have a reason to
>> leave behind dwb.
>> Then again, Webkit itself sucks so badly that using GTK & glib won't
>> really hurt surf. One could say that surf is a suckless interface to
>> sucky GTK and sucky glib, which interface with C++ WebKit, which in turn
>> interfaces with the World Wide Web of Suck.
> I'd say surf should be blink[0] based in the midterm future. I spend
> some effort on checking how it can be statically linked.
> Granted, it might suck a whole lot more than webkitgtk, but I see the
> days come, when webkitgtk(+) will fall behind.
> The web game isn't suckless. It is suckmore.


Received on Fri Feb 21 2014 - 07:22:02 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 21 2014 - 07:24:15 CET