Re: [dev] [st PATCH] X geometry changes

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Amadeus Folego <amadeusfolego_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:41:39 -0300

> So if bloat is our problem, let's remove all geometry handling code.

But the geom setting would still be useful for handling the floating
and non tiled wms cases.
Received on Fri Apr 25 2014 - 22:41:39 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: 20h_AT_r-36.net: "[dev]"
Previous message: Amadeus Folego: "Re: [dev] [st PATCH] X geometry changes"
In reply to: Amadeus Folego: "Re: [dev] [st PATCH] X geometry changes"
Next in thread: Yuri Karaban: "Re: [dev] [st PATCH] X geometry changes"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Apr 25 2014 - 22:48:06 CEST