Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] Refactor xsetcolorname()

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 14:59:39 +0200

On Sun, 25 May 2014 12:38:05 +0200
FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> wrote:

> Well, I just found out I was partially wrong:

Just to make it clear: It doesn't invalidate the patch in any way. It
was just a false assumption over the nature of the function.

-- 
FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>

Received on Sun May 25 2014 - 14:59:39 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Aaron Burrow: "Re: [dev] [GENERAL] License manifest"
Previous message: FRIGN: "Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] Refactor xsetcolorname()"
In reply to: FRIGN: "Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] Refactor xsetcolorname()"
Next in thread: Alexander S.: "Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] Refactor xsetcolorname()"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 25 2014 - 15:00:08 CEST