Re: [dev] suckless distro
Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> BTW, regarding a static linux kernel for desktops:
>
> - was including as built-ins *all* desktop hardware driver
> modules available in the standard source tree kind of
> "benchmarked" like user space?
>
> That for a "live" stali gnu/linux based system.
Heyho,
I've built me a hardware tailored kernel, containing only the drivers, my laptop
needs and mostly statically linked. Only a few drivers (UMTS modem, wifi, audio)
are built as modules for convenience reasons, so I don't have to reboot if one
of them fails, but can just reload the module.
For a live distribution that would obviously not work.
--Markus
Received on Tue Jun 24 2014 - 08:28:41 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Jun 24 2014 - 08:36:06 CEST