Re: [dev] suckless distro

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Dmitrij D. Czarkoff <czarkoff_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 12:39:24 +0200

Andrew Gwozdziewycz said:
> Arch is pretty good, has great documentation and is quite lightweight.

The most suckless aspect of Arch is nearly undisposable systemd, I
believe.

-- 
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff

Received on Tue Jun 24 2014 - 12:39:24 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dimitris Papastamos: "Re: [dev] suckless distro"
Previous message: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero: "Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] Explicit cast in CEIL macro"
In reply to: Andrew Gwozdziewycz: "Re: [dev] suckless distro"
Next in thread: Balazs Kezes: "Re: [dev] suckless distro"
Reply: Balazs Kezes: "Re: [dev] suckless distro"
Reply: Christian Neukirchen: "[dev] Re: suckless distro"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Jun 24 2014 - 12:48:06 CEST