On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:46:33PM +0200, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 05:23:02PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> > [0]: http://sta.li/faq
> > [1]: http://dl.suckless.org/stali/clt2010/stali.html
> > [2]: http://www.catonmat.net/blog/ldd-arbitrary-code-execution/
>
> BTW, regarding a static linux kernel for desktops:
>
> - was including as built-ins *all* desktop hardware driver
> modules available in the standard source tree kind of
> "benchmarked" like user space?
>
> That for a "live" stali gnu/linux based system.
In regards to sta.li and similar projects the kernel is really
not the issue here. Getting a self-hosted userspace up and running
using the suckless base tools is the most difficult part.
This is mostly because our suckless base tools will probably never
work (by design) with most configure scripts.
Several solutions have been proposed. One is to rewrite the build
systems of the affected software to use make or mk. The other solution
is to build inside an /emul namespace.
Nobody cares how you build the kernel.
Received on Tue Jun 24 2014 - 12:57:27 CEST