On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:30:16 +0200
Jakob Kramer <jakob.kramer_AT_gmx.de> wrote:
> Finally, I don't think that reimplementing a function that already is in
> the standard library for "more efficiency" makes any sense. Correctness
> is most important, and I rather trust my C library implementation on that.
Jakob, this is not some complex function, this is a macro.
I agree on using stdlib-functions in most cases, but here, using CEIL
over ceilf is obvious:
We want to use the value directly as an integer, whereas ceilf returns
a float.
Reat Marttin's implementation to see why our solution is superior and a
not form of NiH.
Cheers
FRIGN
--
FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Received on Tue Jun 24 2014 - 16:39:38 CEST