> Yeah. ^[[6m=>Fast blink isn't even on the (now) canonical reference
> http://invisible-island.net/xterm/ctlseqs/ctlseqs.html
We use
http://www.vt100.net/ as canonical reference.
> I'm not really that enamored with the fastblink patch either, but I felt the
> main loop needed to suck less. Not sure if it does with this patch, but,
> well, it's at least a conversation piece.
I totally agree with you. The main loop is one of the aspect of st that
need more work.
Regards,
--
Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
Received on Tue Jun 24 2014 - 21:43:27 CEST