On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:27:52PM -0700, Ryan O’Hara wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:01 PM, FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:47:27 +0200
> > "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" <k0ga_AT_shike2.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I agree with you and I like the patch. If nobody have problems with
> >> it I will apply it.
> >
> > Cool! :)
> >
> > Yeah, it's the first step on refactoring the main loop. I see some
> > potential.
>
> A problem seems to have appeared! This patch creates an st that is
> unusably slow for me. Using the coarse clock doesn’t seem to help
> either. Is anyone else experiencing the same behaviour? It’s
> definitely 738f555f→5edeec1b, and judging by the processor time, it’s
> an issue of inefficiency rather than, say, sleeping for too long.
Yeah, this was also reported on IRC, I just posted a patch to fix it.
--
Ivan "Colona" Delalande
Received on Thu Jun 26 2014 - 04:32:09 CEST