Re: [dev] Plain text editor that sucks less - an alternative to VIM?
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Silvan Jegen <s.jegen_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't really see the point of editors that use a terminal-based,
> clickable UI. If you want that, you can just use a regular-GUI-based
> editor like gedit, kate etc.
>
I know how much suck comes with GUI editors, but I switched from gedit
to geany when I discovered how gedit chokes with its super-smart
live-hilighting search on larger files. This means, if you have a
large text file and use ^F, when you start typing 't', you'll have to
wait until that pohs (piece and then something with horse) colorizes
every instance on the letter 't' in the whole file. I since cannot
recommend gedit...
cheers!
mar77i
Received on Mon Jun 30 2014 - 11:17:39 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Mon Jun 30 2014 - 11:24:06 CEST