On Mon, Jul 07 2014, Martti Kühne <mysatyre_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> I hope for your sake that you're able to differenciate between the
> different criticisms.
> We may very well appear insane, if you don't care that if you're with
> suckless
>
> * you're in it rather as an individual
I'm sorry, but no I'm not. The copyright is owned by Google. If you
cannot accept corporate copyright there's no point in me trying to get
the patch to be technically acceptable.
By the way, if you don't believe your license can protect you from “army
of lawyers” why did you choose it?
> * you settle for less code complexity at the expense of feature and
> sloc creep
> * and no we don't have to agree with everything
> * and again, we will judge you based on what you disclose about yourself
> * we smell. This I was told when I came here. I still think it's a
> great way to put it.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +--<mpn_AT_google.com>--<xmpp:mina86_AT_jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
Received on Mon Jul 07 2014 - 15:37:05 CEST