> Because if so, there are many many cases where there is no
> precombined version in unicode, so you have to use the combining
> characters.
Yeah, of course, there are a lot of them. The point here is if these
cases are common or not. All the characters that I use can be written
with unicode characters.
> > > characters really seems to be a hassle to support: variable terminal
> > > line, potentially more than twice as long as they actually are
> >
> > I have a similar feeling, but I am not sure about this.
>
> I am coming at this from a selfish "I likely won't do the work"
> standpoint, but I think full and accurate support of Unicode is well
> worth working towards.
I think all the people here think like you.
Regards,
--
Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
Received on Tue Jul 08 2014 - 22:37:42 CEST