Re: [dev] [sandy] [PATCH] VIM key bindings.

From: Dimitris Zervas <dzervas_AT_dzervas.gr>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 00:00:44 +0300

On July 11, 2014 11:05:05 PM EEST, q_AT_c9x.me wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 09:47:33PM +0200, Markus Teich wrote:
>> I disagree. Well designed code is also depending on well designed
>data
>> structures. Data structures, especially core functionality ones, are
>not easily
>> changed or even replaced by other ones in a later state of
>delelopment. They
>> should be well thought through and implemented in a clean way before
>before
>> rushing into feature creep.
>
>If the interface is clearly specified, they _are_ easily replaced.
>Maybe more
>tricky suckless projects would benefit from splitting in more that one
>C file
>using header files to make the API clear. That would not necessarily
>make the
>line count bigger.
>
>-- mpu
Why are we stuck not to use headers?
I thought it just was not needed.
Apart from the 10 lines difference, is there any other reason?
Performance maybe?
Received on Sat Jul 12 2014 - 23:00:44 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Jul 12 2014 - 23:12:06 CEST