Hi Markus,
My patch adds a decidenavigation() callback, which is exactly where that interface would need to be called. I can add it to my branch with minimal effort, and even make a separate patch, but handling the dependency would need to be done in a way that conforms to the suckless philosophy. What do you do for that? Do you just offer it as a patch and let people solve the build porting themselves? Is there an example I can look at?
Thank you,
Ben
Original Message
From: Markus Teich
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 2:03 PM
To: dev_AT_suckless.org
Reply To: dev mail list
Subject: Re: [dev] surf alternatives for Adblock Plus, Privacy Badger, Self-Destructing Cookies, BetterPrivacy
Ben Woolley wrote:
> It won't solve the problem of reducing ads, focusing on privacy. You could
> probably use a hosts file or something to block most of the ads.
Heyho,
Basic adblocking can easily be done with the /etc/hosts file[0]. However I also
plan to adapt the recent jumanji[1] adblock.[ch] files from their repositories
develop branch to be usable in surf. However I have no idea when I have the
time to get it done, so maybe someone of you guys is faster. ;)
--Markus
0:
http://surf.suckless.org/files/adblock-hosts
1:
https://git.pwmt.org/?p=jumanji.git;a=blob;f=adblock.h;h=a726d6bac9474f6a665883f878fa053ec0e86c1d;hb=refs/heads/develop
Received on Mon Jan 26 2015 - 23:19:58 CET