Re: [dev] [surf] [patch] 13 patches from my Universal Same-Origin Policy branch
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 09:03:49PM +0200, Antenore Gatta wrote:
> On 29/03/15 17:03:25, noname_AT_inventati.org wrote:
> > How about sending no UA at all?
> >
>
> Not sending a UA at all, makes your browser fingerprint uniq and not the other
> way around.
>
> Probably a safer solution is to have an array of (user's tailored) UAs and loop
> through them, but expect strange behaviours as highlighted by Dmitrij.
It is a short-term solution. This way all privacy-aware browsers are
spread across several largest anonymity sets instead of creating their
own. They do not even make available anonymity sets significantly
larger.
The long-term solution is to stop sending UA and convince others (Dillo
developers and TorBrowser first, addon developers and users second, major
browsers last) to do the same.
Received on Sun Mar 29 2015 - 21:26:36 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Sun Mar 29 2015 - 21:36:07 CEST