Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH 3/3] Remove 'slide' variable in tresize.
Heyhey
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 05:30:16PM +0000, noname wrote:
> ---
> st.c | 9 ++++-----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/st.c b/st.c
> index 51bd40c..ce2646e 100644
This patch series does not change the logic and results in slightly
fewer lines of code so I like it. Also
Tested-by:s.jegen_AT_gmail.com
Combining these patches into a single patch with a more extensive
commit log message describing the changes would have been easier to
review. The patch would have looked similar to this.
diff --git a/st.c b/st.c
index b2bcfe9..45519a3 100644
--- a/st.c
+++ b/st.c
_AT_@ -2769,7 +2769,6 @@ tresize(int col, int row) {
int i;
int minrow = MIN(row, term.row);
int mincol = MIN(col, term.col);
- int slide = term.c.y - row + 1;
bool *bp;
TCursor c;
_AT_@ -2779,20 +2778,18 @@ tresize(int col, int row) {
return;
}
- /* free unneeded rows */
- i = 0;
- if(slide > 0) {
- /*
- * slide screen to keep cursor where we expect it -
- * tscrollup would work here, but we can optimize to
- * memmove because we're freeing the earlier lines
- */
- for(/* i = 0 */; i < slide; i++) {
- free(term.line[i]);
- free(term.alt[i]);
- }
- memmove(term.line, term.line + slide, row * sizeof(Line));
- memmove(term.alt, term.alt + slide, row * sizeof(Line));
+ /*
+ * slide screen to keep cursor where we expect it -
+ * tscrollup would work here, but we can optimize to
+ * memmove because we're freeing the earlier lines
+ */
+ for(i = 0; i <= term.c.y - row; i++) {
+ free(term.line[i]);
+ free(term.alt[i]);
+ }
+ if(i > 0) {
+ memmove(term.line, term.line + i, row * sizeof(Line));
+ memmove(term.alt, term.alt + i, row * sizeof(Line));
}
for(i += row; i < term.row; i++) {
free(term.line[i]);
better, no?
Thanks for the patch(es)!
Cheers,
Silvan
Received on Sat Apr 11 2015 - 20:31:41 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Sat Apr 11 2015 - 20:36:07 CEST