Re: [dev] [st utf8 3/4] Change internal character representation.

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Connor Lane Smith <cls_AT_lubutu.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 11:55:49 +0100

On 4 May 2015 at 11:30, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero <k0ga_AT_shike2.com> wrote:
> But uint32_t is not guaranteed to be present in all the implementations

uint32_t is guaranteed in POSIX 2004, but you may not want to rely on that.
uint32_least_t, which would suffice, is guaranteed in C99.

cls
Received on Mon May 04 2015 - 12:55:49 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero: "Re: [dev] Odds and ends (2/2): $XEMBED"
Previous message: Roberto E. Vargas: "Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] Replace close and dup with dup2."
In reply to: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero: "Re: [dev] [st utf8 3/4] Change internal character representation."
Next in thread: suigin: "Re: [dev] [st utf8 3/4] Change internal character representation."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon May 04 2015 - 13:00:11 CEST