Thanks. Unfortunately, choosing a language and it's compiler at work is not
an thing which one can do when working on existing project.
Personally, I would stick to lisp for fun projects or C (at work) if I had
given a choice.
On 11/29/15, Rashad Kanavath <mohammedrashadkm_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Greg Reagle <greg.reagle_AT_umbc.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:59:32PM +0100, Rashad Kanavath wrote:
>> > Hello Dimitris,
>> >
>> > I saw some mails on hackers list with subject line containing "scc".
>> Since
>> > then I looked into suckless page about the project. I took a wild
>> > guess
>> > that it is "simple c compiler"
>> >
>> > But couldn't find anything in the page. So I guess it is not
>> > officially
>> > release yet. And maybe a simple question on the list could get me some
>> > help. ;)
>> >
>> > Thank you very much.
>>
>> A simple search will find it immediately:
>> https://duckduckgo.com/?q=suckless+scc.
>>
>> But you're right--it is C, not C++. I think that the vast majority, if
>> not
>> all, of the suckless developers think that C++ is irredeemably crappy.
>> You
>> would get a (slightly) better reception asking about Rust or Go. Search
>> the
>> list archives for some opinions about them.
>>
>> Personally, I'm not in love with C--it is too low level for my
>> preference.
>> But the suckless developers seem to be very dedicated to C. It is
>> extremely
>> fast to compile and to run, and produces extremely small executables.
>> The
>> alternatives tend to fall short on one or more of these criteria.
>>
>
> Thanks. Unfortunately, choosing a language and it's compiler at work is not
> an thing which one can do when working on existing project.
>
> Personally, I would stick to lisp for fun projects or C (at work) if I had
> given a choice.
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Rashad
>
--
Regards,
Rashad
Received on Sun Nov 29 2015 - 18:30:07 CET