Re: [dev] A replacement for at.

From: Mattias Andrée <maandree_AT_kth.se>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 17:03:11 +0100

Wouldn't you need a service supervisor with
at's functionallity? Are there any?

If you want to do things really simply you can use
sleep-until (https://github.com/maandree/sleep-until),
but then you cannot as easily list jobs and run
the before scheduled.


On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 15:17:43 +0100
Kamil Cholewiński <harry666t_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> > satd is an unprivileged daemon that is user-private, and
> > starts and exits automatically.
>
> Why not use a service supervisor?



Received on Fri Jan 01 2016 - 17:03:11 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Jan 01 2016 - 17:12:09 CET