Could we at least get the bug fixes pushed into suckless repo?
I don't think Jaromil has introduced the bloat yet.
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Marc André Tanner <mat_AT_brain-dump.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 08:54:19AM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> On 16 May 2016 at 23:22, Marc André Tanner <mat_AT_brain-dump.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 01:27:40PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
>> >> I think the vis editor alone is enough bloat in the suckless
>> >> repositories.
>> >
>> > I don't know what vis has to do with the original thread, nonetheless
>> > it would be interesting to know which aspects of vis you consider
>> > bloated?
>>
>> I can only imagine he meant sandy which I would suggest to be removed asap.
>
> In principle sandy is a fine editor, it has a few nice ideas (doing
> as much as possible with external tools, the prompt handling, a very
> simplistic approach to syntax highlighting etc.) and should be
> positioned as a simpler nano. It also has various limitations which
> I deemed unacceptable for vis, but they are mostly there by design
> as a result of its simplicity.
>
> My main critique concerns the introduction of vi like key bindings,
> which seem bolted on and in my opinion do not fit its design at all.
> Adding them was a mistake.
>
> --
> Marc André Tanner >< http://www.brain-dump.org/ >< GPG key: 10C93617
>
Received on Sat May 21 2016 - 13:12:54 CEST