Re: [dev] pledge(2) patches
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:39:04PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> What it all brings up is the issue of IPC. Can you people suggest
> your favourite approach to IPC? If not, maybe we could look into
> writing a very simple library (name-suggestion "sippy" :P) which
> builds on top of UDS and implements a very simple messaging
> protocol.
You should reserve "sippy" for a suckless CUPS replacement.
Received on Mon Jun 06 2016 - 16:22:30 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Mon Jun 06 2016 - 16:24:11 CEST