Re: [dev] [scc] typeof is a gcc keyword

From: Marc Collin <marc.collin7_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:53:23 -0300

So let's consider 3 situations.
1-- Compile scc with gcc. Use the output binary to compile scc. Get B1
2-- Compile scc with tcc. Use the output binary to compile scc. Get B2
3-- Compile scc with clang. Use the output binary to compile scc. Get B3

Are you saying that if we compare the md5 of B1, B2 and B3 they will
be identical?


On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Evan Gates <evan.gates_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Marc Collin <marc.collin7_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >Any compiler following the c99 standard will work.
>> But a binary compiled with gcc or clang will suck. No?
>> Even if scc source is suckless, won't the binary suck with we use
>> gcc/clang to compile it?
>
> If you need to build a compiler, and don't like the third party
> compiler you use, it's not a big deal. As soon as you build your
> compiler for the first time, use it to compile itself. No matter which
> compiler you used the first time, the result of using a compiler to
> compile itself should be identical.
>
> emg
>
Received on Tue Jul 05 2016 - 18:53:23 CEST