I believe that we will have to strive to keep X11.
2016-08-02 20:33 GMT+02:00 Silvan Jegen <s.jegen_AT_gmail.com>:
> Heyho
>
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:27:49PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:04:20 +0200
>> patrick295767 patrick295767 <patrick295767_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Patrick,
>>
>> > Do you believe that Wayland will replace X11 one day? ;)
>>
>> this is a tough question to answer. If we are headed on the current
>> course, I think we will face even more difficult times in the future
>> with worse monocultures than we have today (systemd, Gnome, ...).
>>
>> > Besides, don't you believe that Ubuntu may have time to time some
>> > negative influence on Linux phylosophy?
>>
>> Is this a rhetorical question?
>>
>> > Quote:
>> > Display server expert Daniel Stone explains what is really happening
>> > with the future of graphical display protocols on Linux. So far as
>> > most Linux users are concerned, Wayland is the project that is
>> > eventually supposed to replace the X Window System (X).
>>
>> Here's the thing: Wayland really does not make a complete stack, it
>> merely is a very thin protocol which allows the talk between clients and
>> between client and compositor. Everything else (rendering, buffer
>> management, input management, ...) that used to be handled by X.org in
>> a reasonable manner is now pushed to each compositor. So if
>
> One can argue that having a simple protocol *is* the suckless part of
> Wayland (dont forget Xprint[0] :P). The Wayland protocol also does not
> allow for communication between clients directly[1] but only through
> the Wayland compositor.
>
> I see two main issues that stem from switching to Wayland.
>
> 1. With Wayland there will be no non-compositing desktop.
> 2. Since rendering is done client-side and there is no Xlib, it may be
> harder to get pixel on your screen if you don't want to use one of the
> big GUI libraries like Qt or GTK2/3/++/whatev.
>
> As a non-expert in this space I am not sure the Wayland future is looking
> that bleak though.
>
> Velox[2] does not look bloated to me and wayland-enabled st[3] is only
> barely larger than the current X11 version's git tip (though the wayland
> version depends on wld[4]).
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Silvan
>
>
> [0] ftp://www.x.org/pub/X11R6.8.1/doc/Xprint.7.html
> [1] https://wayland.freedesktop.org/architecture.html
> [2] https://github.com/michaelforney/velox
> [3] https://github.com/michaelforney/st
> [4] https://github.com/michaelforney/wld
>
Received on Tue Aug 02 2016 - 22:39:19 CEST