Re: [dev] Allow secure access to Web site

From: Pickfire <>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:40:17 +0800

I would also really like to see a hidden service for, not
everyone uses hidden service but it's generally really easy to set it
up, I tried setting it up some time ago without even setting up port
forwarding in router.

But one thing I heard that is going to be coming out is that the length
of the new hidden service is going to be a lot longer than just:


On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 01:00:28PM +0200, Aaron Marcher wrote:
>On 08/03, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>>A onion service might be a consideration, to add something similar to
>>┬╗security┬ź as an access method for
>A hidden service would be a really good idea. I totally agree with that:
>End-to-end encryption and no CA. I could generate a domain with scallion
>like this: sucklessXXXXXXXX.onion if you want. I did that for my personal
>blog some week ago. Also over secure remote generation if you wish.

Do what you like, like what you do.  -- Pickfire
Received on Thu Aug 04 2016 - 08:40:17 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Aug 04 2016 - 08:48:12 CEST