Re: [dev] neatroff

From: FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 10:10:28 +0200

On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:44:45 +0200
Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

Hey Anselm,

> The stali plan has changed for me a bit during the last year. A couple
> of months ago I tried to get stali self-bootstrappable based on just
> src/. I have now given up on this idea for various reasons:
> [...]
> Any help is welcome under the new premises above. I think it is kind
> of a hygene factor to not aim for a self-bootstrappable environment.
> The beauty is that target platform, not the src/. The src/ is hideous
> in most parts anyways, if you consider what stali relies on.

I've been wondering for a while what you think the problem is with
OpenBSD. Wouldn't it make more sense to somehow start an initative in
OpenBSD to promote static linking there?

Cheers

FRIGN

-- 
FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Received on Thu Aug 11 2016 - 10:10:28 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Aug 11 2016 - 10:12:18 CEST