> However not without labor on the part of the developer.
check the script i posted on this mailing list before that doesn't
require any labor on part of the developer since i posted it.
On 6/13/17, Kamil Cholewiński <harry666t_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, sylvain.bertrand_AT_gmail.com wrote:
>> When mentioning souldcloud, I usually refer to the "sound editing"
>> feature.
>
> As a person that does most of his music making in plain old analog
> (including a tape recorder), I miss the point of having a web service
> doing audio stuff, i.e. what can SC do in the browser that I couldn't do
> with a desktop app?
>
>> For youtube, we agree 100%, but it seems that the javascript/modern web
>> engine
>> combo is used as a kind of DRM... namely the dependency by complexity is
>> _on
>> purpose_ (see the user agreement of youtube: you MUST use the
>> javascript/modern
>> web engine video player. [...]
>
> In principle, in practice youtube-dl[1] still works pretty well ;)
> However not without labor on the part of the developer.
> I suspect there will be a way, as long as YT allows watching videos
> without logging in - which would get a lot of people upset.
>
> [1]: https://rg3.github.io/youtube-dl/
>
>
Received on Tue Jun 13 2017 - 14:46:38 CEST