Re: [dev] Yet another C compiler

From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 20:27:48 +0200

wt., 21 maj 2019 o 20:12 <sylvain.bertrand_AT_gmail.com> napisał(a):
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 09:27:19AM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> > wt., 21 maj 2019 o 08:14 Michael Forney <mforney_AT_mforney.org> napisał(a):
> > >
> > > On 2019-05-20, sylvain.bertrand_AT_gmail.com <sylvain.bertrand_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Sadly, gcc-4.7 does not have an aarch64 backend and it's a pain to
> > > > configure
> > > > without breaking anything.
> > >
> > > I wonder what the state of ARM/aarch64-4.7-branch is:
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/branches/ARM/aarch64-4.7-branch/
> > >
> > > It doesn't look like this branch is exported in the git mirror, but
> > > maybe if I can figure out git-svn, I can merge it into my branch.
> >
> > I think you should look more here:
> > https://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/7.4-2019.02/
> > http://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/gcc-linaro/7.4-2019.02/
> >
> > To my knowledge, they are the ones who are most responsible for
> > support for aarch64.
>
> Unfortunately g++ 7 is c++ already. The last C g++ is gcc-4.7.4. Didn't know of
> this gcc 4.7 branch (I stay far away from svn which is a real pain to build and
> so ugly compared to git). My guess is this branch is actually dead (6 years) or not
> working. If I am wrong, it would be good news for aarch64/arm64 bootstrapping
> from C (namely you would not need a x86* system to build the stuff).

You're right. This is my mistake. It should be 4.7.

https://releases.linaro.org/archive/13.05/components/toolchain/gcc-linaro/4.7/


Daniel
Received on Tue May 21 2019 - 20:27:48 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue May 21 2019 - 20:36:08 CEST