Re: [dev] [smu] Updated smu ready for

From: Karl Bartel <>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 14:50:02 +0200

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 5:48 PM Karl Bartel <> wrote:
> But there is a good solution to make this example work: Implement the
> list start number behavior[1] from the CommonMark spec, so the even
> though these items are treated as different lists, each item will get
> the intended number. So far, smu always started counting from 0. I'll
> do that if nobody voices an opposing opinion.

I went with this approach and the numbering is now as expected:

If anyone finds other cases where output gets worse, please let me know!

Anything else I can do to prepare this for being used at

Received on Tue May 05 2020 - 14:50:02 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed May 06 2020 - 14:12:09 CEST