On 21/01/16 10:13, Spenser Truex wrote:
> I can't imagine any way that this is desirable. I will try to patch a
> fix later, seems like low hanging fruit.
I think this should be a patch for dwm, in order to not increase the
complexity of the code. The idea of dwm and suckless programs is simplicity of
the code, additional functionality comes in the form of patches and is optional.
Received on Sun Jan 17 2021 - 12:14:37 CET