Ok. But this is a behavioral change right? How can a patch help in this case?
Admins always protest the decision in almost every community if it isn't theirs. Am I suggesting something harmful here? It takes a minute to sign a release and this improves security. It makes sure that user gets the same piece of code that the dev made.
If that action helps suckless, why be reluctant because I initiated that mail?
Thanking you
Sagar Acharya
https://designman.org
17 Apr 2021, 02:39 by hiltjo_AT_codemadness.org:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 09:16:30PM +0200, Anders Damsgaard wrote:
>
>> * Sagar Acharya <sagaracharya_AT_tutanota.com> [2021-04-16 20:01:56 +0200]:
>>
>> > Was any decision taken with regards to this? Would we have certain checksums and sigs for releases in future?
>> >
>> > Thanking you
>> > Sagar Acharya
>> > https://designman.org
>>
>> Sagar, please realize that people are volunteering their time, and I think
>> most are doing it for fun. As far as I can tell, you are not entitled to
>> demand any action. If you want something done, send a patch and expect
>> it to be carefully scrutinized.
>>
>
> I agree with this and for now it won't be changed.
>
> The admins team will make a decision about this if needed.
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Hiltjo
>
Received on Sat Apr 17 2021 - 07:45:16 CEST