2021-04-20 10:56 GMT+02:00, Laslo Hunhold <dev_AT_frign.de>:
> I'm certain the only main reason Ada wasn't picked up is because it was
> developed in the military, and the hippies in the FSF didn't like that.
Probably it's a matter of power (no GNU folks in that standard
commission) and of taste (Ada never been a hip program, the object
oriented rubbish occupied twenty years of GNU and FSF work alone, and
GNU traditionally embodies an important Lisp community).
> Another problem is a lack of compiler diversity, but don't we also have
> that with C? And other than C, which becomes infested with
> GNU-extensions on a massive scale, Ada is still developed by consortium
> and relatively safe from that.
Imho there is good fragmentation and bad fragmentation, compiler
diversity ends up with creating a corporation or a foundation or a
political body to control it and then it's bad fragmentation.
Received on Tue Apr 20 2021 - 12:50:40 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Wed Apr 21 2021 - 00:36:08 CEST