Re: [dev] Replace ranlib(1) calls?

From: Laslo Hunhold <dev_AT_frign.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 17:14:20 +0200

On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 16:38:14 +0200
Markus Wichmann <nullplan_AT_gmx.net> wrote:

Dear Markus,

thanks for sharing your thoughts!

> That design would afford some flexibility to the whole business: ar
> doesn't need to know the object file format and ranlib doesn't need to
> know the ar file format.

I have one question here: Doesn't ranlib(1) need to understand the
ar-format to be able to add the symbol-table-file?

With best regards

Laslo
Received on Wed Aug 03 2022 - 17:14:20 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Aug 03 2022 - 17:24:08 CEST