On April 9, 2023 11:47:33 AM UTC, Quentin Rameau <quinq_AT_fifth.space> wrote:
>Hi PFX,
>
>> I am using the wrong words "not properly configured", what I mean is,
>> since mx.suckless.org supported tls connection before, but right now
>> mx.suckless.org downgraded to non tls, is this deliberately to be doing
>> so?
>
>Thanks for the info!
>
>> they are not enforcing tls, since mx.suckless.org supported tls before,
>> according to their log, last time mx.suckless.org has tls on
>> 2023-02-06, so they use the cache for the following email delivery, but
>> out of a sudden, mx.suckless.org downgrade to non tls, so email failed to
>> deliver.
>>
>> so my question is downgrade from tls to non-tls on mx.suckless.org is a
>> deliberated step?
>
>No, suckless.org MX configuration hasn't changed since last April (2022).
>
>Also, you can test yourself to see that smtps and starttls are supported.
>(https://www.checktls.com/TestReceiver can help for example,
>if you don't trust your own setup)
>
>I suspect the problem is different, maybe rather a configuration change
>on your mail provider in february?
>
>In any case, that's not a refusal for help, don't hesitate to pass
>further information on if you find something new on either side!
>
Hello from plch.xyz.
My server enforces 's' protocols on all coms, I specify that in all configs of everything. My mail is getting through okay (unless I forget to update my certs).
This doesn't seem like suckless issue.
--
Dormouse
Received on Sun Apr 09 2023 - 16:34:35 CEST