On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:59:38AM -0400, Juan Fuentes wrote:
> On 8/1/06, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_10kloc.org> wrote:
> >
> >On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:30:44AM -0400, Juan Fuentes wrote:
> >> That's what I thought, none the less may I suggest a small
> >> comment, to avoid the visual shock of the plain "CMDS" on the
> >> code?
> >
> >Sure, if you know a better way, tell me.
> >
>
> Wish I could say I do, but the truth is I don't, but it does make sense, and
> I agree with your implementation and intention. Now
> that I know what you were going for, it makes sense, it was just a visual
> shock when I saw it in the web tree. So I suggest the
> comment in the code to avoid people asking and bothering you about it in the
> future, thou I may be the only one that hasn't seen
> this type of thing done before.
Nah, I think combining CMDS with KEYS sounds ok to me, because
CMDS is only used within the keys structure...
-- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Tue Aug 01 2006 - 16:17:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:29:50 UTC