Re: [dwm] dwm-0.6

From: Anselm R. Garbe <>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 17:11:09 +0200

On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:18:29PM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 8/3/06, Anselm R. Garbe <> wrote:
> >That's true, but an acceptable compromise in my opinion.
> I beg to differ: since this renders the patch pretty much
> useless, it becomes obsolete, and probably shouldn't be
> included at all. I think this CONFIG functionality must either
> be fixed or be removed: lack of functionality is better than
> broken functionality...

I removed the CONFIG patch again, now everything is like before
I applied Jukkas patch. I think you are right that the mixture
of both approaches cannot be sanitized.


 Anselm R. Garbe  ><><  ><><  GPG key: 0D73F361
Received on Thu Aug 03 2006 - 17:11:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:29:53 UTC