Re: [dwm] Max Mode Per Tag

On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 16:47 +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 04:41:10PM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> > On 8/7/06, Ross Mohn <rpmohn_AT_waxandwane.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 16:31 +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> > ><snip>
> > >(in fact, If it weren't for these classic-approach-only apps like the GIMP,
> > >it would probably be a good idea to get rid of the per-client 'isfloat' as
> > >well: using for instance three tiled and three floating clients in one tag
> > >shows quite clearly how well these two paradigms mix; unfortunately, as
> > >long
> > >as there are paradigm-specific apps, we'll need the per-client 'isfloat').
> > ><snip>
> > >What about for transients / pop-ups?
> > >-RPM
> >
> > Transients and pop-ups are probably the best examples of
> > single-paradigm apps one can give ;-)
>
> And they are the only reason for Client->isfloat.

For my usage pattern, there are some applications that I always want to
be maxed. Fortunately, most are grouped together in one tag, hence my
preference for a per tag-based max mode. Also, besides the apps that I
make float with a rule, I sometimes want to float a specific window
temporarily, hence my preference for a client-based float mode.

I will scratch my own itches ;-)
-RPM
Received on Mon Aug 07 2006 - 17:55:04 UTC