On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 03:04:42PM +0200, Julian Romero wrote:
> On 8/23/06, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_10kloc.org> wrote:
> >If a window shows up tagged with a tag which isn't viewed atm
> >one could consider to highlight such tag in some way (this was
> >done in wmi) but I'm not sure it is worth the effort, because it
> >would lead to several cornercases. I pretty much prefer using
> >apps which provide sane interfaces. The other way makes dwm too
> >complex.
> Hmm...higlighting the tag is too much. I prefer looking only the
> status message (I used it now to alert me about remote services
> crashing, high load and the like) for changes.
Well, if your status refresh is not to fast, you could patch the
dwm source in client.c:manage(), at the end you could add:
else {
strcpy(stext, "new client in invisible tag");
drawstatus();
}
Then you'd see that message in the status bar until the next
write operation on stdin occures... if a client shows up which
isn't visible.
However this is too crude for the mainstream dwm distribution.
-- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Wed Aug 23 2006 - 15:15:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:30:21 UTC