On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 04:49:49PM +0000, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 8/24/06, Sander van Dijk <a.h.vandijk_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> >Maybe there's a middle road here: add a second color tuple, but remove
> >the bordercolor completely (and use forecolor for the border too).
> >Then you'd have just four colors to define: back- and forecolor for
> >non- and selected items.
>
> ... well, in theory this sounded great to me. Now that I'm home and
> actually looking at it, I'm ashamed that this was actually my idea.
> The looks of this is all the justification needed for an extra two
> (border) colors (the way the tagpart of the statusbar looks with these
> strongly contrasting borders is just painful...). Sorry for this
> guys...
> And by the way, I believe that the current way of highlighting the
> tags of a client isn't that great either (it's not obvious enough to
> interpret in one glance, yet too obtrusive to completely ignore). This
> "little box in one of the corners" idea mikshaw proposed looks better
> to me (though I'll have to use it a bit longer to be sure). At least
> it's clearer than the current situation.
I haven't seen/tested yet what I pushed, because I'm still busy
with some other crap... oh dear I'm pretty excited how this 4
colors look...
Regards,
-- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Thu Aug 24 2006 - 18:53:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:30:28 UTC