On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:26:51AM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 8/25/06, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_10kloc.org> wrote:
> >> If that makes it in, a fourth bgcolor could even be worth considering,
> >> for the modelabel and clienttitles (I'd put that modelabel to the far
> >> left of the statusbar, and then an additional bgcolor would be good to
> >> avoid confusion; using the same bgcolor for the modelabel and
> >> clienttitle would make it immediatelly clear where the row of tags
> >> begins and ends).
> >
> >I think such mode indicator should have the same bg color as the
> >status text area...
>
> Hm... I'm not sure about that. The mode indicator should have a
> different color than the tags, to avoid confusion. Giving the mode
> indicator the same color as the status text area should fix that, but
> then there's still the unclarity when the last tag is selected (since
> it'll have the same color as the client title). If we're going to add
> more colors anyway, I'd rather see it something like this:
> DEFBG
> SELBG
> UNSELBG
> STATUSBG
> with mode and clientitle (both in the statusbar and on clients) having
> DEFBG, selected tags SELBG, unselected tags UNSELBG, and status text
> STATUSBG.
I pushed something different now. Actually I removed the border
color after all, instead there are following colors by default:
#define SELBGCOLOR>----->-------"#666699"
#define SELFGCOLOR>----->-------"#eeeeee"
#define NORMBGCOLOR>---->-------"#333366"
#define NORMFGCOLOR>---->-------"#cccccc"
#define STATUSBGCOLOR>-->-------"#dddddd"
#define STATUSFGCOLOR>-->-------"#222222"
This looks: http://wmii.de/shots/dwm-20060825.png
Regards,
-- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Fri Aug 25 2006 - 13:06:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:30:30 UTC