Maybe shorten processmodifiedtagging to processtag()?
Kurt
On 8/29/06, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_10kloc.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:17:24PM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> > On 8/29/06, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_10kloc.org> wrote:
> > >Ok, I applied something similiar:
> > >
> > >http://10kloc.org/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/dwm?fd=2ec9cead84a7;file=tag.c
> >
> > Hm, I think 'applytag' is a little confusing, since that's not really
> > what it does; not sure what the right name would be though...
>
> Yea, however processmodifiedtagging is a bit long. Maybe
> commit() ?
>
> Regards,
> --
> Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
>
>
Received on Tue Aug 29 2006 - 17:25:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:30:41 UTC