Re: [dwm] improve config.mk

On Sep 6, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Ricardo Martins wrote:

>
>
> An ebuild for dwm would be either too complex, due to the number of
> compile-time configuration options, or too simplistic, perhaps
> defaulting to config.default.h.

As soon as I discovered DWM (last week!) I though immediately about
an OpenBSD port tree port. But it's too easy to build dwm as is.
Why complicate it?

---
Jack J. Woehr
Director of Development
Absolute Performance, Inc.
jwoehr_AT_absolute-performance.com
303-443-7000 ext. 527