On 14:47 Wed 06 Sep , Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> Apparently we are in violent agreement! :-)
>
> Well, I guess DWM must attract two types of "customers":
>
> 1) People who love simplicity.
> 2) People who want to take a simple piece of software someone
> else wrote and build castles in the sky from it!
>
> Or maybe we are each and everyone one of us a mixture of both!?
Heh, indeed we are! I must agree again with you. In my opinion, dwm
is a window manager that actually works and frees the user to be more
productive, instead of murking around.
It suffices to say that my "working environment" path was KDE ->
XFCE -> Openbox -> ion3 -> wmii -> dwm. I migrated progressively to a wm
that was simpler, faster and less distracting.
And yes, being very simple code-wise makes it very easy to extend and
personalise, or even create a new wm more suited for another perspective.
Regards,
-- Ricardo Martins ><>< www.swearing-ape.net ><>< GPG key: 3B818E27Received on Wed Sep 06 2006 - 23:19:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:31:00 UTC