I like it... if for no other reason but that it's so different from
other WMs. But I also have worked it so most terms use the title for
their status (like vi, emerge status, etc.) If it were removed, I'd
have to focus the window to read the info rather than just glancing.
On 11/8/06, Radoslaw Moszczynski <rm_AT_ipipan.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:49:51PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I waited quite long with this proposal, but now it's time for me
> > to ask what people think about the small titlebar in front of
> > unfocused windows. I'm not really sure I'd miss it.
> >
> > I notice that I rarely look at it, and if I look at it, only
> > because I want to determine the focus state, which means the
> > focused client (which does not present such a titlebar).
> >
> > Actually the client area already presents what the window is all
> > about.
> >
>
> I've been using dwm for less than a month (btw: I love it), so maybe I'm
> not in the position to judge, but I'd keep the titlebars: I think
> they're pretty useful if you have a lot of windows open.
>
>
> Cheers-
>
> -RM
>
>
-- Pancho needs your prayers, it's true. But save a few for Lefty, too. -- T. Van ZandtReceived on Wed Nov 08 2006 - 17:07:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:32:23 UTC